How Bullynx articles are researched, written and reviewed

Who writes Bullynx articles

Bullynx is an indie, one-person company. Antoine Duno, the founder, is accountable for everything published on this site. He designs, builds and tests the product, and he is the final editor on every article, including the ones that do not carry his name.

Every article shows a byline that links to a profile page. Two bylines exist and both are real:

• Antoine Duno, the founder. He carries the byline on the reviews and comparisons of AI trading tools, where the point of view is his own.
• Bullynx Editorial Team, an organization byline for the educational reference articles produced under the process described below. It is an organization, not an invented person, and it is marked up as an organization in the page structured data.

We do not publish articles under invented authors, invented job titles or invented qualifications. Antoine is not a financial adviser and the site never claims otherwise.

How an article is researched and written, and where AI is used

Bullynx uses AI writing tools to help research, draft and structure articles. That is a deliberate disclosure, not an apology: the company is one person, and refusing to say so would be the dishonest option.

What that means in practice:

• An AI tool may produce a first draft, an outline, or a summary of public material.
• No article is published on the output of a model alone. The founder reads, edits and approves every article before it goes live, and is responsible for what it says.
• Numbers, prices, product behaviour and quotations are checked against a primary source before publication. Where a claim cannot be checked, it is removed rather than hedged.
• We do not publish invented statistics, invented benchmark results, invented case studies, invented quotations or invented reviews.

The AI features inside the product are a separate matter, documented on how Bullynx works. Their output is educational only and is never financial advice.

Sources and evidence

When an article rests on a factual claim that a reader should be able to check, the source is listed in a visible Sources block at the end of that article and linked. We prefer the primary source: an exchange, a regulator, a vendor’s own documentation or pricing page, or the original study, rather than a secondary write-up of it.

Where a price or a product limit is quoted, we aim to state the date it was checked, and every article shows its last-updated date. Prices and free allowances in this market change often, and a number without a date is not evidence.

Bullynx does not publish performance claims or benchmark scores for its own AI. The evaluation rubric is published first, on the Bullynx research page, and results will only follow once they exist, with the chart set, the tested version, the date, the raw denominator, repeated runs and the limitations attached. A protocol can be published before a benchmark exists. A score cannot.

How we review other trading tools, and our conflict of interest

Bullynx competes with most of the tools reviewed and compared on this site. That is a conflict of interest, so every review and comparison opens with a disclosure block that says so before the first claim.

The rules those articles follow:

• Factual claims about a competitor come from that vendor’s own public pages or a cited third-party source, and every one of them is linked at the end of the article.
• Where we have used a tool directly, the article says so. Where we have not paid for hands-on access, the article says that too, and does not describe an experience we did not have.
• Vendor prices, plan limits and free allowances carry the date they were checked.
• Where a competitor is better than Bullynx at something, the article says which thing, and comparisons do not award “best” to our own product by default.
• Bullynx does not accept payment, sponsorship or gifts in exchange for coverage, a ranking or a review, and does not publish affiliate links.

Review before publishing, and who reviews

Every article is reviewed and edited by the founder before it is published. That is the review this site can honestly claim today.

Bullynx does not currently retain an independent, credentialed reviewer, for example a licensed adviser or a CFA charterholder, and no article claims to have been reviewed by one. If that changes, the reviewer will be named on the article, given a profile page here, and declared in the page structured data. We will not add a “reviewed by” line to an article that was not actually reviewed by the person named.

Dates, updates and corrections

Every article shows the date it was published. When an article is materially revised, it shows a “last updated” date as well, and that date is the one published in the page structured data and the sitemap. We do not refresh a date to look current without changing the content.

If you find an error, tell us and we will fix it. Corrections that change the substance of an article are made in the article itself and the last-updated date is changed with them. Reach us through the contact page.

Some older articles are being consolidated: where two articles covered the same question, the weaker one is merged into the stronger and its URL redirects there, so a link you saved keeps working.

Educational only, not financial advice

Everything published on this site is educational and general in nature. It is not financial, investment, legal or tax advice, and it is not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Nothing here is personalised to your circumstances, because we do not know them.

Bullynx is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer in any jurisdiction. You are responsible for your own decisions, and trading and investing involve a significant risk of loss. Read the full risk disclosure and the terms of service.